Is it possible to get good results on a Baader filter modifed Canon 450D and a good telephoto lens, or do I need to get a good APO? You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. With the high megapixel cameras, most people are going to ideally want to shoot at 1/200 or faster. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. Olympus 75mm f1.82. Second of all, the incredible sharpness of the photo: I have owned many lenses, most of which I bought because they were supposed to have world-class sharpness, but the Samyang 135mm still stands out to me. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. Just place your subject against a distant background, and half of the job is done. It is harder work than using a zoom lens, and some shots I just cannot get at all (cannot get close enough, or far enough way) but the shots I do get are so much nicer looking than I get with any other lens that for me and my goals it is a fair trade off. To actually learn to compose the photos so that the background complements the image instead of being something that must be blurred away. But that 10Mpix is more than enough to make a very good A3-A2 size print, but your technique needs to be very good as even slight misfocus is even more visible and the rendering faults as well. After a three-year hiatus, we've been at the return of the CP+ camera show in Yokohama, Japan. No more inside shooting with flash! Other times, like the Witch Head Nebula, I love seeing the star responsible for the object in all its glaring glory! :). Focusing should be done on moderately bright stars using the 10x magnified Live View. Also, accurate guiding is essential. "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. The foolproof image seems to be more a case of how a bright fuzzy cluttered moving background can completely detach from the offset dark subject matter and overwhelm it. At f/32, it's pretty soft, but less so than a lot of lenses at that aperture. Thanks to you I got a Rokinon 14mm f2.8 and a 24mm f 1.4 and am considering this lens at the moment, but wonder how it compares to the Canon 135 mm f/2. Because of chromatic aberration, no telephoto lens can be used at full aperture. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. Super sharp from f2. This is a very popular lens, and I am sure there are a ton of lens test reports for it available online. The image below highlights the creative freedom this lens provides. My point is that we must never lose the joy of photography. Sigma 105/2.8 DG EX Macro (very sharp at infinity) This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. Some APOs can be fitted with pricey telecompressors, but those invariably result in vignetting and coma. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. It always happens to me with Samyang, it makes good glasses, fast and sharp, I want to have them, but they are not comfortable to use, not in Sony E, their focus is not precise, and they are not "so" cheap. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . Yuri toropin tests a bunch of lenses on Flickr which is a great source. Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. You can go lower, but you have to watch your technique. I seems many people he are confused about the meaning of the word. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. Very sharp even at f2, build quality, price, weight, autofocus is fast, bokeh, No IS, flare, autofocus isn't quite as consistent as some newer lenses, focus speed, image quality, predictability, Image quality, build like a tank, focus ring, weight. Would it at all be possible to at least make sure the people you publish know a little bit about photography? The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with ED standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the ultra multi-coated optics. In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. 645 lenses such as the mamiya apo line and pentax edif can operate within these conditions without vignetting on apsc sensors. Of the 150 images I considered fit to publish, only 4 were made with the 135. At $900 US it a relative steal. A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. Beware others critical comments here about how flat these images look, the author has chosen specific topics and viewpoints to highlight f2 with this lens, so see the wow review for what it is please and the negative comments need placing in context. Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. However, these APOs have a couple of drawbacks. I cant decide whether to clean it up in processing or let it be. Based on my handful of experiences with this lens in the backyard, I have found these traits to hold true. This photo was captured with the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens using a UV/IR cut filter and a QHY168C dedicated astronomy camera. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop using the aperture ring at the base of the lens. If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. This looks to be an excellent lens with fantastic results. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. @ Juksu - you're pathologically clueless. (purchased for $899), reviewed March 19th, 2012 The focuser adjustment rotates roughly 270 degrees, meaning fine-tuning on a bright star is more precise. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. Canon 60Da DSLR and Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L2 lens at 135mm, f/3.2. The moment I tried the Samyang 135mm F2 for the first time after purchasing it, I immediately felt that it was a very special lens. Images that sing. (purchased for $900). Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. Now i have the f2.8 version, and while the resolution is better it s under no circumstance as good as the f/4 one. In 3 months I got loosy focus ring. If so, which one? If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. f/2, fast-accurate-silent focus, (relatively) small & light, super sharp!! To prevent damage to the lens finish, apply nylon acorn nuts (or cap nuts) to the tips of the retaining ring's three alignment screws. Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. I use it for everything, landscapes, townscapes, interesting detail, portraits. But this lens changed my mind. There's just nothing there. So so far the best that I have used are the 200f2.8L and the 400f5.6L. It really is about talent, creativity, and vision, not gear. Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open Weight. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. But you couldn't have because you don't know even as much as this guy. But for me, the reason to get this lens is the Bokeh and DOF control. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. In my test, nikon have the same color correction than Canon and same sharpness. SharpStar Askar ACL200 200-mm f/4 astrographic telephoto lens, Astrotrac 360 tracking platform first impression, FIELD TEST: CARL ZEISS APOCHROMATIC & SHARPEST (CZAS) BINOVIEWER, Deus_Ex_Mamiya and Michael Covington like this. Optics quality, sharp,very special picture, sharpness, clarity, weight, fast, accurate AF (fringe benefit of f/2), price, no IS, makes you regret buying any zoom lenses, compact, very sharp wide open, good color contrast, bokeh, this is the lens. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! Several functions may not work. Touching the telescope, even ever so slightly, will introduce vibrations which will ruin the photograph. As you know, camera lenses come in varying focal lengths, apertures, and optical quality. On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. I owned this lens for a long time, then traded it for the 70-200 2.8IS II. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. These include canon lens for night photography along with good budget lenses for astrophotography. Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. In general, prime telephotos should outperform zooms. I do know, however, that I can take an equally framed photo I've shot with my Canon kit lens, both zoomed to 100% I run circles around this guy. On the 135/2 all you've got is the bare metal. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. This gives me the power of 162x, which is barely sufficient for my 420mm fl APO astrograph at full camera resolution. But I sold it and went back to using a 70-200 (alongside a 24-70). @juksu - you're such a liar. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors.

Joel Osteen Brothers And Sisters, Articles C