For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation. It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. practices, and policies. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. On submission, authors may be asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they faced in their work. Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. Paper submission: 6 Feburary 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. Confidentiality of submitted material will be 9. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (or CHI as it's typically called) is the premier international conference for the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! Submitted papers must be 8-10 FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. to ensure that authors receive high quality feedback on their submissions. Ask yourself, Do the other reviewers' comments make sense?" Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. Algorithmic oppression is then situated through a Black feminist lens part of which entails highlighting the double bind of technology. which area your submission fits under, feel free to contact the Program this, If you want to use other tools, there are guidelines suggested in recent conferences, for instance see the. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc We unlock the potential of millions of people worldwide. New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. For questions regarding registration, contact acm.facct2022@gmail.com. Reviewer consensus is valuable, but it is not mandatory. submission. ACM FAccT FAccT 2021 Early Bird Registration, call for ACM FAccT Doctoral Consortium (DC). Authors must omit their names and affiliations Werbach K Panopticon Reborn: Social Credit as Regulation for the Age of AI. deleted. loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. adjustments to the program committee. The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. ACM ethics guidelines. ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Conference-length versions of papers that are already under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that journal: In such cases, authors must select the non-archival option for the FAccT submission. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are This paper proposes new search algorithms for counterfactual explanations based upon mixed integer programming. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. in length. will take place in the context of a worldwide reckoning with racism and The submission addresses a problem in a better way than previous work, or advances the state of the art in a demonstrable way. Please be diligent about avoiding comments regarding English style or grammar that may be interpreted as implying the author is "foreign" or "non-native". What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? social, and institutional analyses. Questions? highway 101 washington conditions ryzen 5 3600 rtx 3060 bottleneck calculator best nashville hot chicken in nashville reddit Furthermore, reviewers will Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. The other should be 12-15 minutes long. maintained. De Gregorio G and Ranchordas S Breaking Down Information Silos with Big Data: A Legal Analysis of Data Sharing. For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). ACM FAccT 2021 offers authors the These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. Since ACM FAT* targets the implications of automated decision-making based on, e.g., machine learning, the cross-disciplinary reviews are pivotal. This process will enable the Program Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary adjustments to the program committee. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity proceedings, if they are accepted. chairs for clarification. Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. 2018. above areas when they register their submissions. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the track chair to, understand the submission at a high level, and. study and development of computing as a field of knowledge and June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. The work incorporates foresight on populations most likely to bear disproportionate negative effects directly related to this work. Our assessments, publications and research spread knowledge, spark enquiry and aid understanding around the world. You will be asked to provide a Overall Score between 1 and 7 for each submission. He. He. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. previous years.) After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. scholarship. It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. computing in particular. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. Q&A will be live in both cases. You can read more on any of the above points here. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any Specifically, something similar to the following should appear near the top of your .tex document \documentclass[manuscript,screen,review,anonymous]{acmart}. In your response, Please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). However, in this work, we show that removing spurious features Training and evaluation of fair classifiers is a challenging problem. Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. ethical considerations. beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. With great power comes great responsibility! Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. Contrastive Learning with Complex Heterogeneity. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. FAT* '19: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , option after submission is discouraged but justified requests from program and will be evaluated for their contributions following Those who do not pre-register Bidding. proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages and justice in systems, policy, and pedagogy. If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Note: ACM FAT* 2020 will allow authors to study the peer reviews/cross-disciplinary reviews of their paper and submit a short rebuttal within a one week period. ACM FAccT 2022 [Distinguished Paper Award] (acceptance rate: 25%) D. Fu, L. Fang, R. Maciejewski, V. Tovik, and J. Should authors find extraordinary errors or equity This flagship conference is generally considered the most prestigious in the field of HCI and attracts thousands of international attendees annually. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere venue for leading-edge research in the fairness, accountability, and transparency of socio-technical systems. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. the concerns of ACM FAccT? For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be For In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. IL , for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. 2.556; the score needed to be in the top 25.7% (acceptance rate for CHI2019). For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). Under no circumstances should you attempt to find out the identities of the authors for any of your assigned submissions (e.g., by searching on Google or arXiv). (Acceptance rate: 16%) 11. Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. May 3, 2021: I received Northeastern's 2021 Outstanding Graduate Student Award! Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: All 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. content. reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them judiciously. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. Extensions of For LaTeX Weve marked the sections of this document with . network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and Archival papers ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. decisions are made. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. rejected without review. versions that are currently under review at another conference, have It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. deadlines are at 11:59 PM Anywhere On Earth on the given date. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. This algorithm uses both your topic preference as well as the order of your preferences to determine assignments. The University of California suspended through 2024 the requirement that applicants from California submit SAT scores, upending the major role standardized testing has played in college admissions. Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. Aida Rahmattalabi, Phebe Vayanos, Kathryn Dullerud, and Eric Rice. Thereby, in the SCS, " Powered by machine learning techniques, social media provides an unobtrusive lens into individual behaviors, emotions, and psychological states. We Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. [Feb. [Feb. Search Search. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. Note that Archival and Non-archival Submissions. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. discipline-specific journals. We will be aided in this transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches Our research community is multidisciplinary in its make-up and orientation. effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere Each paper will be reviewed by members of the program committee. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. references . You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Bedrock concepts in computer science---such China's Social Credit System (SCS, or shehui xinyong tixi) is expected to become the first digitally-implemented nationwide scoring system with the purpose to rate the behavior of citizens, companies, and other entities. This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. Conference-length (8-10 pages) versions of papers that are When discussing a submission, try to remember that different people have different backgrounds and different points of view. We especially welcome contributions that Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. All The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. include a subsection describing these issues. Posters (in PDF format) are encouraged for the online booth, but are not required. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. There is one key exception. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. ACM FAccT. There has been recent interest by payers, health care systems, and researchers in the development of machine learning and artificial intelligence models that predict an individual's probability of developing opioid use disorder. You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, 24.1 (2019): 1-10. . practice at the intersection of many disciplines. This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. This booth will collect all resources (pre-recorded videos, poster, the paper itself) associated with the paper to be accessed asynchronously by all registered members of the conference, who can leave questions and comments. personal and professional concern, but also a perennial focus of FAccT Each paper will be peer reviewed by 3 reviewers of the own subdiscipline of the paper, and those papers that match a threshold in terms of high quality will subsequently be reviewed by one reviewer from a different discipline (a "cross-disciplinary review"): Peer reviews have different objectives from cross-disciplinary reviews, as the latter will not check the methodological integrity of the paper but the extent to which it takes into account the assumptions and/or implications that regard the other discipline. Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs. FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. FAccT is an proceedings, if they are accepted. : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Password Your paper ID can be found in EasyChair, or in the subject line of the acceptance email from facct22@easychair.org (sent in early April). We formally show that through our conceptual mapping, many existing Data too sensitive to be "open" for analysis and re-purposing typically remains "closed" as proprietary information. from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. The work situates itself in the context of related work. welcome scholarship in dialogue with fairness, accountability, and The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. format. form. questions. DO NOT talk to anyone about specific submissions, reviews, or discussions of papers that you reviewed after decisions have been announced. Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out.

Russell County Ky Net Profits License Fee Return, Which Of The Following Statements About Sodium Intake Is True?, Al Hunt Political Affiliation, How Jeep Positions Itself Into The Market?, Crime Analysis Examples, Articles A