manuscript under consideration nature communications

. Research is often a slow process, requiring the careful design, optimization, and replication of experiments. https://mts-ncomms.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2041-1723%5BISSN%5D. Nature Communicationsrequires an author contributions statement as described in theAuthorshipsection of our jointEditorial policies. Reconstructing the infrared spectrum of a peptide from representative However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. //-->manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods - afroeuro.pl Yet contemporaries with first-hand experience of the new colonial societies in process of formation on the other side of the Atlantic were in no doubt that they deviated in important . How much time does the scientific journal 'Nature' take from - Quora Figures divided into parts should be labelled with a lower-case bold a, b, and so on, in the same type size as used elsewhere in the figure. Information about the common editorial policies of Nature journals, including Nature Communications, is available here. Nature Communications | Peer-Review Duration, Review Speed, Revision A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. Please note that modification of Supplementary Information after the paper is published requires a formal correction, so authors are encouraged to check their Supplementary Information carefully before submitting the final version. Nature Communications - SCI - - Why my manuscript is still in "Under consideration" even though it had But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days. Figures should not contain more than one panel unless the parts are logically connected; each panel of a multipart figure should be sized so that the whole figure can be reduced by the same amount and reproduced at the smallest size at which essential details are visible. Cell phones seem to be quite expensive, as are renting 2 way radios. Manuscript under consideration 16th September 21 2021.09.17 321active sites density30Response Letter Consideration should also be given to the patient's potential sense of embarrassment in relation to their symptoms and the impact of complex perianal fistulas on different aspects of life, including relationships, social life and work/professional . We prefer to work with Adobe Illustrator but can accept Word and PowerPoint files. File sizes should be as small as possible, with a maximum size of 30 MB, so that they can be downloaded quickly. We also encourage authors to include any other types of raw data that may be appropriate. It was the first time to submit nature materials, but was rejected by the editor, and it is recommended to transfer to nature comm. Tips. Authors will see a proof of figures. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. D1ckChowder 2 yr. ago It could mean many things. Would the magnetic fields of double-planets clash? Rapid publication can accelerate the dissemination of findings . Privacy Policy. The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. Another update: I got an update from the editor finally after email her asking what it really means. Journal names are italicized and abbreviated (with full stops) according to common usage. Before a manuscript is submitted, please review our journal policies, and ensure that the submission complies with our policy requirements. Cookie Notice As a co-author, i saw recently that our paper switched from status. Using Kolmogorov complexity to measure difficulty of problems? This statement will be published at the end of all papers, whether or not a competing interest is reported. Supplementary Information is not copy-edited byNature Communicationsafter acceptance, so authors should ensure that it is clearly and succinctly presented, and that the style and terminology conform with the rest of the paper. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. We are excited about this new step we are taking in support of early sharing. Internet Explorer). As we are committed to making prompt and informed decisions about publication, we do not consider pre-submission enquiries. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in The authors must include copies of all related manuscripts with any overlap in authorship that are under consideration or in press elsewhere. and our In Review. Authors who nevertheless wish to post a list of Supplementary References should ensure that the Supplementary Information is self-contained (it should not refer to the list of References in the main paper; any such papers should be duplicated in the list of Supplementary References) and that Supplementary References are numbered sequentially from 1. Please see theopen access pagefor APC pricing and details of our free funding support service. How many weeks of holidays does a Ph.D. student in Germany have the right to take? Using this system, authors can upload manuscript files (text, figures, videos) directly to our office and check on the status of their manuscripts during the review process. nature17under consideration - The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. The editors also reserve the right to reject a paper even after it has been accepted if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems with the scientific content or with violations of our publishing policies. The journal editors will take the previous reviews into account when making their decision, although in some cases the editors may choose to take advice from additional referees. Supplementary Information should be combined and supplied as a separate file, preferably in Word format. Published conference abstracts, numbered patents and research datasets that have been assigned a digital object identifier (DOI) may be included in the reference list. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. Authors of submitted manuscripts which include the image Lena will be requested to substitute the image, or justify the scientific necessity for using the image, prior to peer review. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes publisher 14.0 days to publish the accepted manuscript online. Guide to authors | Nature Communications Cite this article. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. More information about In Review for Nature Research journals, including the minimum disclosures required, can be found here. This is known as a rescinding. Standard fonts are recommended and the 'symbols' font should be used for representing Greek characters. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. This is true first of all due to the nature of the subject. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. As noted in our January Editorial 5, AI tools cannot . Does it mean that the original reviewers are now not accessible anymore? Recovering from a blunder I made while emailing a professor. ISSN 2041-1723 (online). If the manuscript includes personal communications, please provide a written statement of permission from any person who is quoted. Reasonable requests to enlarge figures will be considered, but editors will make the final decision on figure size. Nature | Peer-Review Duration, Review Speed, Revision Process We continue to encourage preprint deposition on any community-recognised preprint serverit is solely the authors choice to decide if and where they are going to post their results before the conclusion of the peer review process. 2017-07-13 11:21. To assist with the peer review process, figures and tables may be included within the manuscript text. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). The source data file should, as a minimum, contain the raw data underlying any graphs and charts, and uncropped versions of any gels or blots presented in the figures. (in principle) (accept) (online)NC (Open Access Licence) (Article-processing charge)NC (Proof)Online6 (19:00 Japanese time), *** (20209-20212)140, 2020921Nature Structural & Molecular BiologyManuscript Transferred, 1016109110162, 1020, 1112 (point-by-point response to reviewers' comments), 1211NC (editorial requests), 113NC (proof), *** (20215-20222)250, 2021527Nature Chemical BiologyManuscript Transferred, 76 (Reviewer65), 1031 (point-by-point response to reviewers' comments), 11223 (653), 1213NC (editorial requests), 2022216~ (Editors' Highlights), Nature Communications, (Naturetransfer)NCzipZip of files for Reviewer2-4, Nature Communications, (Peer Review File)NCTransparent peer reviewPeer Review File, reviewer. Taking these issues into consideration, it is . You will know soon. For graphics, we recommend graphicx.sty. Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? From the MTS homepage, click Modify my Springer Nature account and then ORCID Create/link an Open Researcher Contributor ID (ORCID) in the Personal Profile tab. Line art, graphs, charts and schematics. It is the move from what I have proposed to call "cosmotheism" (Assmann 1993), where the divine is conceived of and worshipped as immanent in natureleading ultimately to the idea that nature or cosmos is God, the visible manifestation of a hidden deityto a religion that draws a categorical distinction between God and the world . Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. In practice this means that the absolute width of single-column figures should be no less than 1,040 pixels wide and double-column figures should be no less than 2,080 pixels wide (excluding peripheral white space). Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within each field. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Communications (Nat Commun) If you want to participate in double-blind peer review, prepare your manuscript in a way that conceals the identities of all the authors and tick the appropriate box during online submission. Recents What age is too old for research advisor/professor? Paper in review: "Under Editorial Consideration" - good or bad? All Reviewers Assigned : Nature Communications revised manuscript: What does it means? It can mean many things, if the status has been same since you resubmitted your manuscript then editor might still be waiting for all the reviewers to send the editors their review reports, in some cases when one reviewer is too much busy and needs more time to finalize his review report, editors waits for him to send his comments then they contact the author and make a decision on the basis of these reports and send you acceptance, rejection or revision based on their reports. What does it mean? Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days. All Rights Reserved. Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. An excellent #engineering background (Poly graduate turn PhD).<br> Experienced lab-to-field engineer (Leading researchers out of laboratory for real-world field trials).<br> Advocate for #ASTAR (Promoting science and innovation). Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Unless it is just rejected by an editor. Elevated oncofoetal miR-17-5p expression regulates colorectal cancer progression by repressing its target gene P130. Nature Communications has a 2-year impact factor of 17.7 (2021), article downloads of 85,307,200 (2021), and 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision. Although suggestions can be made by the authors, the final decision regarding the positioning and grouping of such structures rests with the editorial team. [CDATA[// >